Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Rakdos Reanimator | koskadelli | 7-2 | None |
thegrundemer | 0-1 | None |
Jeskai Monument , Jeskai Oculus , Orzhov Reanimator , Rakdos Reanimator , Rakdos Sacrifice , Red Deck Wins , Unknown Archetype
Scrapwork Mutt ranks #194 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 48%).
Colorless average: 65.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Scrapwork Mutt is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 11.67 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Scrapwork Mutt has a win rate of 70.0%, making it 5.0% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Guardian of New Benalia | Creature — Human Soldier | 18 | 56.6% | 6 |
Monument to Endurance | Artifact | 18 | 56.6% | 6 |
Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 18 | 56.6% | 6 |
Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 18 | 54.5% | 6 |
Destroy Evil | Instant | 19 | 53.7% | 6 |
Recommission | Sorcery | 19 | 53.7% | 6 |
Helping Hand | Sorcery | 19 | 53.7% | 6 |
Exorcise | Sorcery | 14 | 53.2% | 5 |
Fear of Missing Out | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 23 | 52.1% | 7 |
Abhorrent Oculus | Creature — Eye | 18 | 51.1% | 5 |
Cards that perform better with Scrapwork Mutt than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Jeskai Monument | 17 | 54.8% | 60.0% |
Unknown Archetype | 6 | 1.9% | 27.8% |
Orzhov Reanimator | 2 | 66.7% | 10.0% |
Red Deck Wins | 2 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
1 | 1.7% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.